´ Steel Curtain Rising: Giants Vanquish Steelers 21-14

What position(s) should be the Steelers highest priorities in the draft?

Monday, October 27, 2008

Giants Vanquish Steelers 21-14

When the history of the 2008 season is written, the summary of the Steelers-Giants might read something like this:

The Steelers hosted the New York Giants at Heinz field in a see-saw defensive battle where Pittsburgh succeeded in going toe-to-toe with the defending Super Bowl Champions until a wild snap made by an emergency long-snapper during a punt play led to a freak safety that tied the game, and ultimately gave New York the
momentum needed to win….


Ah, wouldn’t that give you a nice warm, fuzzy feeling…

No one should be fooled by the score as 21-14 does not begin to reveal the poor showing the Steelers made for themselves. The Steelers lost their first game against “PrimeTime” competition, and their performance revealed some troublesome issues which Mike Tomlin and company must address if the Steelers truly want to become contenders

For three and half quarters the story of the game was the 12 points the Giants netted in five trips to the red zone. New York has a strong offense, and the Steelers defense deserve all of the accolades that come their way for holding the Giants to four field goals in five goal line situations. New York’s domination of the time of possession puts an exclamation point on the defenses’ accomplishments.

All of which begs the question, why did the defense keep finding find itself in those siutaitons?

At the outset of the game I was somewhat surprised to hear Tory Aikman talk about how the Steelers offense has struggled. After all, the team was 5-1 and, while they’d bogged down for a few quarters here and there, the Steelers got on the board when they needed to.

But Bruce Arians and Ben Roethlisberger not only seemed determined to justify Aikman’s criticism, but that determination grew stronger as the game wore on.

Aside from Mewelde Moore’s 32 yard run, and Ben’s long bomb to Nate Washington, the Steelers offense produced nothing all day. They could not protect their quarterback, receivers could not get open or hold on to the ball, they could not convert third downs, and they could not sustain drives.

Did anyone think the Steelers were going to mount a come back when they got the ball after the Giants scored the go-ahead touchdown?

It just wasn’t that kind of day.

Special teams was also once again a liability, as the return units gave up returns of 28 and 35 yards, giving the Steelers defense a short field to defend. While the long-snap fiasco really isn’t anyone’s “fault,” Steel Curtain Rising did point out back when the Steelers re-signed Greg Warren that the value of a long-snapper should not be underestimated (this is one of the times when you hate to be right.)

Bruce Arians and Ben Roethlisberger must bear the burnt of the blame for today’s loss. Ben’s his first and third picks were of the Kordell Stewart variety, even if his second interception wasn't his fault, and maybe his last one can be written off as a desperation heave. Roethlisberger was simply out of sync, and most of the rest of the offense took its cue from him.

The Steelers third drive in the third quarter offers the perfect example. Pittsburgh started on its 23 and advanced to New York’s 38. They were in perfect position to put the Giants away.

Except that a 15 yard unnecessary roughness penalty pushed them back to the Giant’s 47. In the succeeding four plays included


  • A nullified a 53 touchdown strike to Nate Washington (which pushed them back to their own 37)

  • A three yard scramble on a broken play (read, Ben escaped before he was about to get sacked. Again)

  • A poorly thrown deep third down pass dropped by Nate Washington

The Steelers ended up punting from their own 40, and lost Greg Warren in the process.

At this juncture in the season one has to seriously question the play calling of Bruce Arians. The Steelers seemed reluctant to rely on Medwlede Moore, but since then man who went into training camp as an afterthought at running back has shown that he can play.

Against the Giants averaged 4.4 yards per carry, he ripped off 32 yard touchdown, and showed that could both run between the tackles and make a team pay when he can turn the corner on the outside.

Why wasn’t he used more? He did get 19 carries, but he showed every indication of being willing and able to do more. To be certain Moore was held to 21 yards in the second half, but its not like he is the only option. If the offensive coaches were worried about putting too much on Moore shoulders, Gary Russell was there.

Russell has flashed at times at other moments he's been a little flat. But against the Giants his only carry was good for eight yards. Putting Russell in for a series, if only to spell Moore, carried little risk with a might higher potential reward.

The issue of Bruce Arians will be discussed here later on in the week. Suffice to say, the passing offense was unable the execute their portion of his game plan. That was clear early on.

What remains unclear is why Arians showed no inclination to use the other weapons at his disposal. Thus far it has hard to avoid the sensation that Arians, perhaps because of the injury to Parker, (perhaps not) is not comitted to establishing the running game.

The Steelers are seven games into their season and they're having difficulty sustaining drives and they cannot protect their quarterback. The Giants game revealed none of these warts, as each was on display in previous games. But the Steelers were able to compensate for them up until now. In fact, they compensated so well that one wondered if they were aberrations.

The Giants game revealed that the against a legitmate contender the Steelers would not be able simply make up for a several sloppy drives with a heroic comeback.

No, the Giants game demonstrated that the Steelers have some issues on offense, problems that they rectified soon as they play more legitimate contenders over the next several weeks.

Thanks for reading. Please take a moment to either leave a comment or vote in our post-game poll (upper right hand corner.)

5 comments:

dave said...

The word has been out on the Steelers since the Philly game: Get to Big Ben and you get to the Steelers.

I keep hearing that Ben holds onto the ball for too long but why is that the case? Are the receivers taking too long to get open? Is Arians calling plays that take too long to unfold? Is Ben so scared to throw an INT that he's waiting for his guys to get wide open?

Whatever the reason, the Steelers NEED to correct that part of the game. Here are some suggestions:

1. Make Ben run it when he's under pressure. He was a potent weapon back in his rookie year because he was able to make plays with his legs. It seems he's lost that part of his game.
2. Call more screens.
3. Call more draws.
4. Call quick routes and slants like the Giants did to us.
5. Learn from this year and draft/sign a free agent in the off-season.

Russ said...

Big Ben can not run, are you kidding? Do you remember what happened to us during the playoffs last season when the play was letting Ben run on 4th down? I am a true Steelers fan, but Ben has lost what he had prior to the bike accident. We need to stop playing it off and admit the truth. He's holding the ball too long, throwing too many picks, and is not accurate. Ben's decision making is terrible at times. Any other coach would have benched Ben. And why we are still letting him play hurt is beyond me. He's not getting the job done healthy. Sure, he'll throw a couple long ball completions every now and then, but can't finish the games we should have won. We should be 7-0 right now. I can except loses, but not the ones we should have easily won. I don't have a problem with our Defense and Offense, the line can't hold forever for Ben to decide. And not the receivers fault either. Put Leftwitch in and let Ben think about it, and heal up. At least we'll get rid of the ball and avoid yard lose. Just because Ben has that big contract, doesn't give him authority to stay out there and hurt the entire team. We need 1st downs so we can rest our Big Nasty "D".

Anonymous said...

you need your head examined dude.

Hoo186 said...

Good blog. I agree that our record is hiding some key weaknesses on the team, namely the sub-par O-Line. The good news is that most of the teams Steelers have faced, or will be facing have issues of their own that the team can capitalize on (such as Baltimore's complete lack of offense). The bad news, as you pointed out, is that when Steelers play a team without any glaring issues (NYG, and Philly) the team is exposed.

As far as Russ' comment about Ben holding on to the ball too long...even that can be blamed on the o-line. Why? Because for most of the game on Sunday when Ben had more than 1/2 second to throw the ball it was because Pittsburgh was using a TE or a RB as an additional blocker...leaving only 2 or 3 receivers on each play. Ben had to wait for one of them to get open. When they failed to do that, he got sacked. As far as his decision making...did you know that in the past couple of years, Ben is only second to Tom Brady in his overall QB performance in things like ratings, percentage completion, etc? To me, that and our record says a lot more about the guy than another poor performance thanks to the o-line.

KT said...

Thanks to everyone for commenting.

Something is "up with Ben" or at least it was during the last game.

I have my pet theories, and I will write an full entry, time allowing, in the next day or so.

IF you saw today's post on Ron Cook's column, even if Ben is holding the ball too long at times, the offensive line is not getting it done.